Charlie Jade - Season 2 - There's a chance !
#1
Posted 25 May 2008 - 09:07 AM
Scifi picks it up, so I mailed Chris Roland and asked him, if something change.
He said that "There is no indication at this time whether we will go to a second season, but if the series does well on SciFi in the US this will certainly support the possibility of a second season."
I think it's a great news, and there's still a chance for it, but everything it's up to you now.
So, if you want it back, only you have to do is watch.
First 3 episodes:
06/06/2008
08:00 Pm
Charlie Jade
The Big Bang
06/13/2008
08:00 Pm
Charlie Jade
Sand
06/20/2008
08:00 Pm
Charlie Jade
You Are Here
#3
Posted 06 June 2008 - 04:10 PM
#4
Posted 11 June 2008 - 11:19 PM
Anywhen, i really hope ppl tune in and enjoy the show so that it will give a second series a go. Perhaps even SciFi will pick it up from Space if things go well. I feel it could do very well on the network and since most of the original series on SciFi are ***** - mostly the original movies - it would seem like a perfect acquisition.
Also. i'm wondering how SciFi will air the first series since it's 20 episodes long. They could easily treat it like two series to fill spaces splitting in the fall for the return of other show (though i can't remember what shows are coming back?). Ah well, i really hope this show does well as i'm loving it so far and hopefully the second series will get picked up!
#5
Posted 14 June 2008 - 07:43 PM
there is still a good chance and its one i for one am very hopefull for
#6
Posted 20 June 2008 - 10:43 PM
Anywhen, i really hope ppl tune in and enjoy the show so that it will give a second series a go. Perhaps even SciFi will pick it up from Space if things go well. I feel it could do very well on the network and since most of the original series on SciFi are ***** - mostly the original movies - it would seem like a perfect acquisition.
Also. i'm wondering how SciFi will air the first series since it's 20 episodes long. They could easily treat it like two series to fill spaces splitting in the fall for the return of other show (though i can't remember what shows are coming back?). Ah well, i really hope this show does well as i'm loving it so far and hopefully the second series will get picked up!
I am really #$%^&* about SciFi's lack of concern about their viewers and their bad decision in pulling this show. They did not give it a chance at all. Where can I find this show to watch?
#7
Posted 21 June 2008 - 07:50 AM
http://www.veoh.com/...s...u&offset=80
You have to register, turn off the the family filter thing, and download the program.
#8
Posted 21 June 2008 - 10:06 PM
Who would of thunk it.
God forbid tv makes you think.
I'm still surprised to this day that LOST made it past 2 eps.
#9
Posted 22 June 2008 - 12:43 AM
The producers could get away with the adult themed content without having to compromise
the show to satisfy advertisers or network executives.
#10
Posted 22 June 2008 - 05:22 AM
Who would of thunk it.
God forbid tv makes you think.
I'm still surprised to this day that LOST made it past 2 eps.
What you mean by "again" ?
This show never wasn't cancelled.
#11
Posted 22 June 2008 - 08:03 AM
This show never wasn't cancelled.
At this point you're arguing semantics or splitting hairs. Charlie Jade lost financial backing to produce a second season. I'd like to see a second season too, but without money this show is in limbo.
#12
Posted 22 June 2008 - 01:20 PM
We can't give up now.
#13
Posted 23 June 2008 - 05:29 PM
We can't give up now.
Just discovered this show the week before...looking forward to the Episode tonight.
#14
Posted 23 June 2008 - 07:45 PM
Theres nothing wrong with having it be shown later (10-11pm) but 3am in the morning is an idiotic time. Some people don't have Tivo's or VCR's so watching it live is their only option and I'm definately not staying up or waking up at 3am just to watch the show. I've already seen the entire season but I was going to watch it again live just to help it out but now their just being unreasonable **** heads.
#15
scifijunkyuk
Posted 23 June 2008 - 08:11 PM
#16
Posted 23 June 2008 - 11:22 PM
Honestly, 2 weeks?! Either this was a real ****** move or something really strange must have happened behind the scenes... *shrug*
Too bad, i really enjoyed this series, it sort of had a Farscape-esque feel to it
*sigh*
#17
Posted 23 June 2008 - 11:55 PM
We were just teased with Charlie Jade during Prime Time on Fridays for a couple of weeks. And never having seen it before, I was intrigued. I will just set my VCR for 2AM Tuesdays and look forward to the rest of Season 1, as long as it runs on Sci-Fi Channel...
#18
Posted 24 June 2008 - 01:02 AM
We were just teased with Charlie Jade during Prime Time on Fridays for a couple of weeks. And never having seen it before, I was intrigued. I will just set my VCR for 2AM Tuesdays and look forward to the rest of Season 1, as long as it runs on Sci-Fi Channel...
perhaps you should have read the first post...
#19
Posted 15 August 2011 - 12:04 AM
Theres nothing wrong with having it be shown later (10-11pm) but 3am in the morning is an idiotic time. Some people don't have Tivo's or VCR's so watching it live is their only option and I'm definately not staying up or waking up at 3am just to watch the show. I've already seen the entire season but I was going to watch it again live just to help it out but now their just being unreasonable **** heads.
To be honest, Charlie Jade would be a perfect show to pair with Haven so that Sci-Fi Friday can exist again.. And I bet both shows would do better running back to back than either show can do by itself.
I think sci-fi channel has SORT have figured out that bundling shows together brings more audience for the shows. But it seems like they are only willing to do that one week a night.. THAT I don't get..
I don't mind that shows like Ghost Hunters are on Syfy...but not when EVERY Wendesday is a marathon..thats just rediculous. Pair it up with something else and break up the monotony..
#20
Posted 15 August 2011 - 12:07 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











