Not sure where to bring this up, but I figure here's as good a place as any.
Over the past few days, I've been re-watching the first couple seasons (it just felt wrong not to be watching Haven now that they're on hiatus) and I noticed the thing with the ring that Nathan finds on the chief when he buries him. Now, this may be a stupid topic to bring up and it may be totally old by now, but I just now connected that that is the same ring that Vince and Dave give to Audrey that they say belonged to Sarah. I also noticed that after the episode "Sarah", we don't really see Nathan wearing the ring around his neck anymore. I am thinking that maybe this has to do with the whole her always loving a Wuornos thing. Idk, any thoughts?
So, Garland Wuornos wore the ring on a necklace, not on his finger, which suggested to me at the time that it was a woman's ring. My thought with Nathan taking it off and wearing it was that it was his mother's? But maybe he just took it for sentimental reasons because Garland always wore it, even if he didn't know why. Maybe Garland didn't wear it on a finger because he didn't consider himself married anymore, but held onto it for sentimental reasons of his own?
There's kind of a time loop question with whether Nathan wore it back into the past in Sarah and she kept the ring? But then how would there be a separate ring that Vince and Dave gave Audrey? There must be two rings, right?
I guess from screen caps I've seen, the Garland ring looks bigger, like it could be a man's ring, and the Vince/Dave ring looks more delicate, like it was a woman's. So there appear to be two different rings, but they appear to be "matching." http://havenpublicli.../page/The Rings
If the implication is that Garland was Lucy's husband, that makes me squirm. He isn't biologically related to Nathan, but if there was a sexual relationship ... ? Also, wasn't there a Haven Twitter exchange where it was implied that Dave had loved Sarah and Vince had actually been involved with Sarah (something like "Dave got over Sarah a long time ago," "yes, but did he get over you [Vince] and Sarah?"). My thought was that Vince and Dave had a ring from when someone had married Sarah (Vince?). Garland has a separate ring from when he married Lucy? And they are basically the same style? (Gold band with 3-4 diamonds inset in them).
Or did Garland get his ring from Sarah when he was a kid? Like how Lucy left a locket for Duke? A clue for a child who would be young enough in 27 years to maybe remember her?
There's definitely something weird about the rings, but we have so little information it's hard to speculate.
Also, with respect to Nathan, keep in mind that he's not biologically a Wuornos. The Troubles seem to be passed in families. If the mythology is related to these families, does it count if Nathan isn't biologically descended from Wuornoses? There's a Crocker line, but Nathan is really from the Hansen line.